It’s crunch time for the future of Florida’s betting. Legal experts in the know predict that the prolonged conflict that saw West Flagler go to the apex court of the United States will be concluded soon. So, the final push by West Flagler commences on June 13th, when the country’s Supreme Court will hold a conference to consider whether it will take up the petition by the Florida parimutuel. According to the court’s calendar, the justices are expected to make a final decision on June 17th or 24th.

This decision requires at least four of the court’s nine justices to deem the case worthy of a hearing for it to move forward. If the justices approve, then proceedings to this case will probably commence in 2025, thereby dealing another blow to Florida’s regulated gambling scene, more specifically, its online gaming version. If, on the flip side, four justices fail to back the move, then West Flagler will have exhausted all its options at the federal level.

The Bone of Contention Between West Flagler and Florida

On November 7th, 2023, the Sunshine State launched mobile sports betting. On the said date, Hard Rock Bet began receiving wagers from existing gamers before the app became fully operational on December 5th, 2023. The Seminole Tribe of Florida then set up retail sports wagering locations across its six casinos in the state after striking a compact with the governor.

West Flagler, an entity that owns the Bonita Springs Poker room and previously owned the Magic City Casino in Miami, went to the Supreme Court to challenge the Class III tribal-state gaming compact. The compact in question had been agreed upon between Governor Ron DeSantis(R) and the Seminole Tribe, which has been operating the state’s casinos since December 2023.

The plaintiff argued that this agreement was contrary to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA). According to West Flagler, the IGRA Act restricts tribal gaming through state compacts, specifically to tribal land. So, in this case, the pact signed by Gov Rob De Santis and the tribe to facilitate online sports wagering infringed on the specifics of the act.

The matter was presented before the Florida Supreme Court, which dismissed the petition on the grounds that the corporation had filed the wrong type of suit to challenge the compact. The judgment from the Florida Supreme Court read in part:

Quote

“Framed as it is, the petition presents nothing other than a challenge to the substantive constitutionality of the law ratifying the compact… But quo warranto is not, and has never been, the proper vehicle to obtain the declaration as to the substantive constitutionality of an enacted law… For that reason, we deny the petition because the relief that Petitioners seek is beyond the writ of quo warranto provides.”

The Interior Department’s Response

The United States Department of the Interior (DOI), in response to the petition by West Flagler against its ratification of the Florida deal, has asked the country’s Supreme Court to dismiss this petition. According to the department’s attorneys, the agreement’s validity shouldn’t be questioned, seeing that Florida’s lawmakers amended state gaming laws to allow online sports wagering. The actual sports betting is conducted remotely through computer services facilitated by servers sitting on tribal lands.

The attorneys further opined that the federal appeals court ruled that IGRA regulates gaming on tribal land and exclusively states that the regulation applies to “nowhere else.” As such, according to the DOI, this gives the state powers to allow people to transmit their sports wagers remotely to the Seminole’s sportsbook servers and their tribal land. The filing by the DOI read in part:

Quote

“The Court of Appeals further determined that IGRA does not prohibit a gaming compact, which is, at bottom, an agreement between a tribe and a state, from discussing other topics, including those governing activities, outside Indian lands.”

Potential Ramifications of the Ruling

As you can imagine, the aftermath of any ruling by the country’s highest court is far-reaching. On one hand, should the Supreme Court decide to ratify the DOI’s claims, it could set a precedent where federally recognized tribes would now be allowed to initiate iGaming activities. Thus, if this is how the ruling turns out, other states will likely follow suit and pass laws to permit the remote transmission of wagering, as is the case with Florida.

Therefore, the US Supreme Court will have three pertinent decisions to make – deny certiorari, grant certiorari, or initiate a summary reversal. That said, experts on the legal front think that the Supreme Court will most likely deny West Flagler’s request and that the Seminole monopoly will live on beyond the projected judgment day. Should that happen, it wouldn’t essentially end West Flagler’s quest for justice from their point of view.

West Flagler and other groups still have the option of appealing to the State Supreme Court to change the pertinent language involving the state and the Seminole tribe. Be that as it may, it is also convenient to add that the state’s Supreme Court has already rejected prior attempts to weaken this pact. For now, however, the rest of the country will be watching with bated breath, given that many stakeholders have interests in the outcome of the case.